Time Clock Piece is one of Tehching Hsieh’s
most extensively documented year-long art projects. The piece occurred between
April 11, 1980 and April 11, 1981. The gallery setting itself conveys a
uniquely distinct meaning from the previous lecture. The symmetrical nature of
the room itself displaying the vast amount of documentary photographs, the
film, and remnants of the piece are very factual. Minimalist even. The concrete
representation of time into distinct units is a prevalent theme in Hsieh’s work
and tackles a difficult topic concerning the physical breakdown of such
intangible abstractions. This deconstruction and representation is evident in
the aesthetics of the gallery space itself. The space attempts to represent a
year of Hsieh’s life and a year-long art piece through the unitization of an
idea; the transformation of the abstract to a presentable reality. Immediately
upon entering the space the viewer is overwhelmed with the countless rows of
images. It is noted that one typically starts with the end of the documentation
and progresses through the series in a reverse-chronological order due to the
curation of the project. This has a different feel to the piece altogether and
begs closer scrutiny on the part of the viewer in examining the photographs. It
also tends to make the viewer look for “differences” in the sequential images.
Perhaps this trend arises to satisfy the need for physical proof that each
image is, in fact, a distinct photograph and not a copy. It is easy to dismiss
each image due to the seeming monotony of the individual pieces of
documentation however, one is just as easily taken back by this thought when
the realization dawns upon the viewer that each photograph marks a whole hour.
The punch-cards displayed above these photographs also reiterate this feeling
and help personalize the data shown, contextualizing it within the events of
one man.
Hsieh emphasizes the nature of his work is simply
to “waste time” and show, through his actions, the passing of time. In this
piece particularly this message is apparent due to the extensive chronological
documentation. This is emphasized by the legal certification of the project by
a lawyer. However, while Time Clock Piece
seems to engage in conversation with theoretical investigations into presence
and surveillance, production and control, discipline and submission Hsieh
denies these connections to any of his pieces. The connotations of Time Clock Piece on production and
submission seem to function as a larger social critique of the monotonous and
demanding existence in a capitalist culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment